Scenario 1 - What if Lastman had done 2% for the first 3 years instead of 0% (1998-2000)?
We may only need a 4.127% increase in 2024 to have the same cumulative property tax increase since amalgamation.
Scenario 2 - What if Tory had done 1% more every year in his first two terms (2015-2022)?
We may only need a 2.285% increase in 2024 to have the same cumulative property tax increase since amalgamation.
Scenario 3 - What if Tory had done 4% every year (2015-2023)?
We may only need a 5.725% increase in 2024 to have the same cumulative property tax increase since amalgamation (and note that 2023's historically high increase would be just 4%).
Scenario 4 - What if Ford had done 2.5% in his first year instead of 0% (2011)?
We may only need a 7.805% increase in 2024 to have the same cumulative property tax increase since amalgamation.
Scenario 5 - What if we had done 4 years of 1% instead of 0% (1998, 1999, 2000, 2011)?
We may only need a 6.188% increase in 2024 to have the same cumulative property tax increase since amalgamation.
Obviously, this is not a robust what-if analysis...
... but the exercise helped me visualize how small investments in our city can add up over time and how past decisions impact us to this day. Let me know your thoughts.